
Playing loads YouTube’s privacy-enhanced player. Privacy · Watch directly on YouTube ↗. No automatic playback.
BassLureFish field video #8. One recorded session or video overview is not proof of a universal fishing rule.
Read the catch report: counts, context & related angler experiences →
| Archive | Video #8 · 22 available long forms |
|---|---|
| Published on YouTube | 2026-06-28 |
| Duration | 19:05 |
| Evidence type | Original filmed session / field notes |
| Species | European sea bassOriginal BassLureFish field notes |
We receive some kit, discounts and affiliate commissions. Read our commercial relationships.
What we tested
Static/no-retrieve presentation and an active retrieve were compared in the same field test.
What this session suggests
When fish are present but not committing, doing less can be a genuine option. Pauses and dead-sticking deserve a place in the retrieve toolbox.
What this does not prove
A 4–0 score is striking but still a small sample from one session. It does not mean active retrieves are generally inferior.
Read the current YouTube description
In this fishing experiment, the static retrieve / deadstick presentation caught 4 fish, while the active retrieve caught 0 in the same conditions. I was genuinely surprised by how much better the static retrieve worked, and in this video I break down what happened on the water, why the fish may have preferred a slower presentation, and whether we should start changing our fishing tactics going forward.
If you’ve ever wondered when to use a static retrieve, when to deadstick a lure, or how retrieve cadence can completely change the bite, this video is for you.
Do you think the static retrieve was better because the fish were inactive, pressured, or just not willing to chase? Drop your thoughts in the comments — I really want to hear what you think happened here.
#Fishing #Deadstick #LureFishing #retrievespeed #experiment #ukbass #bassfishing
Source: the public description supplied by BassLureFish on YouTube. Last checked 2026-10-07 18:55 UTC.
Your experience can add context.
What happened when you changed the retrieve?
Describe the retrieve, the tide and what you observed. Say whether you actually compared presentations in the same session.
For video #8: Stop Retrieving Your Lure… Seriously.
Open this video to comment on YouTube ↗Optional: prepare my own comment
Your words, not an AI-written experience. This tool formats only what you enter. BassLureFish does not send or store this draft. Copy it, then decide whether to paste and post it on YouTube.
Keep private contact details, other people’s information and precise fishing marks out. None of these fields is added to a website search index.
0 characters
Make it say exactly what you mean. We add no praise, catches, hashtags or promotional links. Changes to the fields above do not overwrite your edited draft unless you choose to prepare it again.
On YouTube, sign in if needed, paste into the comment box and press its Post button yourself. This website cannot prefill, post or confirm your comment. Your browser or device may retain clipboard or restored form content; use Clear when finished.
Public comments you post on the included YouTube videos can appear automatically in this searchable archive. Author profiles are hidden; the original words are preserved. Our own comments carry a small “Channel contribution” label. Privacy and comment removal.
Share, save or follow the next test
Send it to a fishing friend.
Share the original footage, not just the conclusion.
Keep it for your next trip.
Open on YouTube to save ↗Use YouTube’s Save or Watch Later control. Opening this link alone does not save anything.
Prefer tests to tackle opinions?
Follow the next BassLureFish field video on YouTube. You choose whether to subscribe there.
Visit BassLureFish to subscribe ↗Watch next: Stop Retrieving Your Lure Like This (We Tested It)
We tested the two retrieve styles directly in the same fishing context.

Keep or share these related videos →
Full sessions. More from the water.
Watch the tests on YouTube. Follow Toby and Monty on Instagram.
More experience. More context.
Explore anglers’ experiences and questions from this video, or add your own on YouTube.
This video isn’t trolling. We are drifting.
Stop Retrieving Your Lure… Seriously.
Watch BassLureFish: Stop Retrieving Your Lure… Seriously. ↗
Details and original discussion
Posted 2026-09-06 · checked 2026-10-07.Hello Angelo. We weren’t trolling in this video. Just drifting over a sandbank with the engine off. The static rod is just placed in a rod holder. V easy and simple. As long as tide is running reasonably hard (say two days either side of springs) there is no need to retrieve.
Stop Retrieving Your Lure… Seriously.
Watch BassLureFish: £20 TEMU vs £800 TENRYU: Can Cheap Fishing Gear Really Compete? ↗
Details and original discussion
Posted 2026-09-04 · checked 2026-10-07.Good morning, my name is Angelo and I am writing to you from Italy. I would like to know in detail how you make the lead trolling mount, as well as at what cruising speed you go. I look forward to your reply. Greetings
Stop Retrieving Your Lure… Seriously.
Watch BassLureFish: Stop Retrieving Your Lure Like This (We Tested It) ↗
Details and original discussion
Posted 2026-09-04 · checked 2026-10-07.Good morning, my name is Angelo and I am writing to you from Italy. I would like to know in detail how you make the lead trolling mount, as well as at what cruising speed you go. I look forward to your reply. Greetings
Stop Retrieving Your Lure… Seriously.
Watch BassLureFish: Stop Retrieving Your Lure Like This (We Tested It) ↗
Details and original discussion
Posted 2026-09-04 · checked 2026-10-07.Search all 44 comments on this video →
Add your experience on YouTube ↗Continue the investigation.
How should you retrieve a bass lure? — view related evidence →
